SEC/C // CAPABILITY STATEMENT

Capabilities.

Five things we do well, each one backed by a system we run in production. The evidence rows below name the actual deployments, so every claim on this page can be checked against a running system.

Delivery model: senior engineers only, no bench. The person who scopes your work is the person who builds it.

NAICS541511 (primary) · 541512 · 513210 · 541519 · 611420
UEI / CAGEPending, SAM.gov registration in process
StatusWoman-Owned Small Business, self-certified

CAP/01

Custom Software & AI Systems

We design and build production software with AI models embedded in the core workflow, not added as a chat widget: document understanding with page level citations, computer vision pipelines that compare jobsite photos to a plan, and voice guided task assistants. Every system we ship, we operate ourselves in production, so we carry direct knowledge of the operational cost and failure modes of the AI we build.

In productionDebriefed · TaskPilot · Cared AI
In pilot / demoDexter (vision) · Calyssa (clinical extraction)
Patternspage cited Q&A · photo based VQA · structured extraction · voice guidance

CAP/02

Cloud Architecture, AWS & Cloudflare

Our production systems run on a mix of AWS, including EC2, Lambda, DynamoDB, API Gateway, Cognito, and S3, and Cloudflare, including Pages, Workers, and D1, chosen per workload rather than defaulting to one vendor. We build for cost visibility and contained blast radius from the start: per pool spend caps, signed origin authentication between edge and origin, and infrastructure a small team can operate without a dedicated operations function.

AWS surfaceEC2 · Lambda · DynamoDB · API Gateway · Cognito · S3
Cloudflare surfacePages · Workers · D1 · DNS/CDN
DoctrinePer workload platform choice. Spend caps and blast radius limits from the first commit.

CAP/03

Rapid Prototyping

We move from a stated problem to a working, testable prototype quickly because every person on the team can design, build, and deploy independently, without waiting on a separate design or infrastructure group. The AI guided staff training platform on this site is one example: a working prototype built as internal research and development to validate an interaction pattern before proposing it to a customer.

MethodOne engineer owns problem, design, build, and deploy. No handoff chain.

CAP/04

Secure Development Practices

Every production system we operate has been through internal adversarial security review covering authentication, per user and per IP rate limiting, resistance to prompt injection in AI facing inputs, and data isolation between accounts, with findings fixed before the next release rather than tracked and deferred. We treat all inputs, including inputs passed to AI models, as untrusted until verified.

Review scopeauthn · rate limiting (per user, per IP) · prompt injection · data isolation
PostureAll inputs untrusted until verified, including inputs to AI models.
DisciplineFindings fixed before release, not deferred to a backlog.

CAP/05

Technical Advisory

As a small team that has personally written, deployed, and debugged the systems described on this site, we advise on architecture choices, AI model and vendor selection, and build versus buy tradeoffs from direct operating experience rather than from a slide deck. That includes plain assessment of what an AI system can and cannot reliably do in production.

ScopeArchitecture review, AI model and vendor selection, build versus buy analysis.
StancePlain assessment of what AI can and cannot reliably do in production.